The Project Report - Construction Guidelines
Refer to guidelines on what to include in your report to ensure your report addresses the assessment criteria.Each student is required to prepare a report on the project which he/she has undertaken and to submit two paper copies of the report for assessment. An electronic copy should also be provided. The report is the ONLY basis for assessment and further advice on report writing is available from supervisors and there are a range of texts on the writing of reports in the Edward Boyle Library and local bookshops. Students should have attended the meeting on report writing. Confirmation on the best way to write the report should be sought at the progress meeting.
Please note that reports from previous years may be a useful reference when writing up, but their style may not represent good practise according to the current guidelines.
The target audience for your report include :
- supervisor and assessor (to assess the report)
- possibly a third assessor (to confirm/amend awarded grade)
- external examiners (to confirm/amend awarded grade)
- future project students (to extend research/analyse content)
Submission
Project reports (two copies) should be submitted to the School of Computing Student Support Office. Attach (not bind) a copy of the marked mid-project report to each report. Submit an electronic copy using the SIS submit system. Reports submitted after the deadline will only be accepted under extenuating circumstances.Double-sided submissions are encouraged. Latex is recommended for the report write-up.
Layout
latex Template
- Length
- Construction
- Production
- Layout of Project Reports
- Citing material and References
- Page Numbering
Please see the UK TeX FAQ for general guidance.
Also, Andy Roberts has written a Latex Guide.
Can use pdflatex directlyLatex template
Template files are available at: ~scsfproj/public/latex/
Amend and include files as necessary.
Edit FYP.tex to include any new files.
Edit refs.bib to add references that are cited in the report body.
Type
One copy of the project report will be retained by the School.
The second copy
may be collected by the student once the examination process has been
completed and any borrowed material including library books and keys
have been returned.
Students should use the School printers for only one copy. The other should
normally be a photocopy.
Students who intend to produce reports on their own word processors
should ensure that the print is of sufficient quality (laserwriter
quality is not necessary, but lineprinter quality is not acceptable).
The report must be produced in black text, but colour may be used where it
clarifies figures and/or diagrams. The production of one copy with colour
figures and one with black and white is allowed if approved by the supervisor
but it is the only case where the
two copies may differ; the copies should otherwise be identical. BOTH copies are
assessed and any discrepancies between them WILL be penalised.
If there is any uncertainty, get (written) approval from the supervisor
or project coordinator after giving them a sample
printout before becoming too heavily committed to using a particular
text preparation system.
"The candidate confirms that the
work submitted is their own and the appropriate credit has been given
where reference has been made to the work of others
I understand that failure to attribute material which is obtained from another
source may be considered as plagiarism."
Students must sign this declaration.
[The 'window' is 108mm wide, 58mm deep. It is in the centre of the page so that there are 120mm below it and above it, and there are 50mm on its left and
52mm on its right.]
Download a Word front page template.
When using this template, please ensure that the paper size for your printer is set to 'A4', otherwise the titles will not be fully visible through the 'window' once the report is bound.
Cross-Referencing The inclusion of Appendices A, B and C is compulsory. Appendix A should be used to identify whether or not the project achieved
personal objectives. Students should reflect on the project process rather
than the project outcome(s). Typical content would include
accounts/assessment of what went well/badly and what would be done
differently given the opportunity. It is expected that no more than one page
is required. Appendix B should provide a brief record of materials used in the solution
that are not student's own work. Such materials might be pieces of codes
made available from a research group/company or from the internet, datasets
prepared by external users or any preliminary materials/drafts/notes
provided by a supervisor. It should be clear from Appendix B what was used
as ready-made components and what was developed as part of the project.
Students should include Appendix B even if no external materials were used. Appendix C should provide a brief summary of how ethical issues which
arose during the project were addressed. Details on what might be considered
to raise an ethical issue can be found here.
Other appendices are optional and, if used, should be identified by a
sequential letter and a title, for example, Appendix D The Job Market
Questionnaire ... Appendix E Examples of the Use of the Model.
The two most used
listing styles are:
For a BOOK/(Chapter in a book) the reference should also include:
Sonka, M, Hlavac, V & Boyle, R D, (1998), Image Processing, Analysis and
Machine Vision, 2nd edition, PWS.
For an ARTICLE the reference should also include:
Simpson, L, (1996),
Do decision makers know what they prefer?:
MAVT and ELECTRE II, Journal of the Operational Research Society,
47(7): pp.919-929.
For a URL the reference should also include:
Proll, Les, (2001)Constraint Programming and OR Home Page, URL:http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/sacm/ [15th March 2001]
Note - references should not be predominantly web-based as generally these are
not refereed. If a web reference refers to work published elsewhere, you should
give the full published reference.
[2]Fores, Sarah & Proll, Les, (1998) Driver scheduling by integer linear programming - the TRACS II approach, FTP:ftp://ftp.comp.leeds.ac.uk/scs/doc/reports/1998/98_01.ps.Z [16th March 2001]
[3]Fores, Sarah, Proll, Les & Wren, Anthony, (1999),
An Improved ILP
System for Driver Scheduling, in: Computer-Aided Transit Scheduling,
Wilson, N H M (editor), pp.43-62, Springer Verlag.
[4]Proll, Les, Constraint Programming and OR Home Page, URL:http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/sacm/ [15th March 2001]
[5]Simpson, L, (1996),
Do decision makers know what they prefer?:
MAVT and ELECTRE II, Journal of the Operational Research Society,
47(7): pp.919-929.
[6]Sonka, M, Hlavac, V & Boyle, R D, (1998), Image Processing, Analysis and
Machine Vision, 2nd edition, PWS.
Fores, Sarah & Proll, Les, (1998) Driver scheduling by integer linear programming - the TRACS II approach, FTP:ftp://ftp.comp.leeds.ac.uk/scs/doc/repo
rts/1998/98_01.ps.Z [16th March 2001]
Fores, Sarah, Proll, Les & Wren, Anthony, (1999),
An Improved ILP
System for Driver Scheduling, in: Computer-Aided Transit Scheduling,
Wilson, N H M (editor), pp.43-62, Springer Verlag.
Proll, Les, Constraint Programming and OR Home Page, URL:http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/sacm/ [15th March 2001]
Simpson, L, (1996),
Do decision makers know what they prefer?:
MAVT and ELECTRE II, Journal of the Operational Research Society,
47(7): pp.919-929.
Sonka, M, Hlavac, V & Boyle, R D, (1998), Image Processing, Analysis and
Machine Vision, 2nd edition, PWS.
For more than three authors note that the format 'Jones et
al' should be employed in the text with all authors included in the
citation in the listing of the references at the end of the text.Length
A 40 credit project report must be no longer than 50 pages (not including
appendices and not including the bibliography/references);
the limit for 60-credit projects is 60 pages.
Marks will be deducted where students exceed this limit
without first receiving the permission of the project coordinator.
The report must not spread over more than one volume (a second volume will
not be accepted under any circumstances). Program
listings should not be included in the report but should be made
available to the project supervisor, (preferably online or CD)
who in turn will make the listings
available to the assessor and external examiners, if needed. Important
program fragments may be bound in the body of the report only if the
listing fits onto an A4 page.
Construction
The report must be in typescript, sequentially page numbered,
on A4, single or double sided with 1in margins.
Point size 11 and one-and-a-half line spacing should be used.
Two copies must be submitted;
each must be bound in School covers with white spiral plastic binding.
The staff in the Computing Student Office will provide guidance and materials for
binding. The second copy of
the report should be a good quality photocopy.
Students who are uncertain as to whether their intended method of report
production will meet the requirements should show a sample to their
supervisor or the project coordinator at an early stage (before they
are committed to that method).
Production
Students should not underestimate the time needed to 'type' a report of
the length and quality required. When planning the 'typing' of the report
allowance
should be made for hardware difficulties that could
cause delays and for adequate time for proof-reading and correction.
Unexpected difficulties in producing reports should be reported to the project
coordinator when they occur (and before the submission date rather than
after).
Layout of Project Reports
The following layout is strongly recommended, as consistent presentation will strengthen the
examiners' overall impression of well-organised project work. Marks can be lost for poor
presentation if this format is not observed.
- Title Page
The title of the project report together with the student's name,
degree programme and session (e.g. 1998/99) must be clearly readable through
the 'window' of the front School cover. At the foot of the title page
the following statement is to appear :
- Summary
The Summary is to be set out on a separate page and be a concise
statement of the problem you set out to solve.
It should be no more than one A4 page.
- Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments are optional but if included they should be on a
separate A4 page and include, where appropriate, reference to any
contribution made by others to the project.
- Contents Page(s)
The contents page(s) should list the title of each chapter of the
report and the sections or sub-sections within chapters together with
their page numbers.
- Body of the Text
The body of the text will consist of any appropriate number of chapters
which will themselves be sub-divided into sections and sub-sections.
Chapters should start on new pages. It
is important to avoid excessive sub-division and the use of too many
levels of headings and sub-headings and too many levels of numbering.
Again there is a need for balance with the key test being readability.
To assist the reader it may be necessary to cross-reference appropriate
sections in the report and this can be done by page number, section
number or section name. It is easier to use one of the latter two as
page numbering is only available towards the end of the report
preparation process. Whichever of the section cross-reference
mechanisms is chosen it must be used consistently.
- References
See below.
- Appendices
References
Please also refer to the discussion on citing source material.
Bibliography Section
All sources must be cited within
the body of the text and listed in ONE separate section
after the body of the report and before the appendices. Footnotes or
reference sections for individual chapters are not acceptable.
Practise in the identification of references varies. (The
ACM has a
recognised style for computing
literature.)
Whatever format is chosen it should be consistent throughout the report.
A recommended style for School of Computing projects is given at the
end of this section.
A reference should be sufficient to find a text.
Each reference should include :
- Author(s)
- Date of Publication
- Title of Work
- Publisher
- Chapters/Pages (if applicable)
Fores, Sarah, Proll, Les & Wren, Anthony, (1999),
An Improved ILP
System for Driver Scheduling, in: Computer-Aided Transit Scheduling,
Wilson, N H M (editor), pp.43-62, Springer Verlag.
- Title of Volume (and eds. if applicable)
- Page Numbers
Clark, Martyn & Fores, Sarah, (2000), Strategic Teaching for Strategic
Students , School of Computing Research Report Series Report
2000.24
- URL
- Date of last visit by you
Fores, Sarah & Proll, Les, (1998) Driver scheduling by integer linear programming - the TRACS II approach, FTP:ftp://ftp.comp.leeds.ac.uk/scs/doc/reports/1998/98_01.ps.Z [16th March 2001]
Citing from within the text
The 2 most frequently used ways to cite references from within the text are:
The style recommended for projects within the School of Computing
is to cite by author and order references alphabetically. Whatever style
is adopted please ensure that it is consistent throughout the report.
In [4] we see how the work of the Transport Scheduling Unit within the
School of Computing at the University of Leeds has influenced driver
scheduling using many different mathematical and heuristic techniques. Specific
uses of column generation techniques within a mathematical programming
framework for solving scheduling problems are discussed in [2] and [3].
 
[1]Clark, Martyn & Fores, Sarah, (2000), Strategic Teaching for Strategic
Students , School of Computing Research Report Series Report
2000.24
OR problems attempt to aid a decision making process using different,
often problem specific, techniques. Simpson (1996) compares different
approaches to solving multicriteria decision making problems, whereas
Fores and Proll (1998) and Fores et al (1999) discuss a particular
application of a mathematical programming solution technique.
 
Clark, Martyn & Fores, Sarah, (2000), Strategic Teaching for Strategic
Students , School of Computing Research Report Series Report
2000.24